> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:31 PM > To: mouss > Cc: Jeff Peng; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: URIBLFP? [Was: SA or Commercial AntiSpam products] > > mouss wrote: > > (top posting because not a reply:) > > > > this message triggers: > > URIBL_BLACK (nease DOT net. found in the message footer) > > MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY (because of > X-Originating-IP: > > [218.19.159.186]) > > > > and also > > DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE > > DNS_FROM_RFC_POST > > MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER > > > > is the uribl listing justified or is it too "aggressive"? > > >
Is the listing justified? Hrmm.. An SA Dev (which will remain nameless) requested this listing at 2005-07-19 21:10:16. It was accepted at 2005-07-20 01:03:49. Its been listed since then... No requests for change or delist. We'll be happy to move it to grey if need be... But nobody has spoke up since its listing. Thanks, Dallas
