-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Hepworth wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig McLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 23 December 2005 16:03
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: I'm afraid I might have to report this list as a spam source
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>>> You are all speculating. No one knows why or if the original poster
>> can't
>>> unsubscribe.
>> I'll agree with that, to a point.
>>
>>> And, frankly, it was the first posting of this kind I've ever
>>> seen. It's not a problem at all.
>>>
>> I'll disagree with you here, I have had to contact the list-owner to get
>> a dynamic address unsubscribed because when I tried the normal channels
>> everything got bounced.
>> Maybe this guy is just the first to complain out loud?
>>
>> Anyway, I'll second (third?) Jim Nasby's comments that:
>>
>> "It's surprising to me that the SA lists aren't just run through SA.
>> Spam making it past that is a good indication of where SA could be
>> improved afterall."
>>
>> C.
>>
> 
> But of course when people drop examples etc it'll get blocked. I have the SA
> list whitelisted other wise it's FP all over the place.

As is the oft-repeated mantra of this list:

"SA doesn't block mail, it scores it."

C.

- --
Craig McLean            http://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       Where the fun never starts
        Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDrCVHMDDagS2VwJ4RAsDdAKD0rVshgzsCE1xzBlPpE9eSux7q+QCfbxJ3
XtA0kFwc1ZBBMaxNuEDAxXQ=
=bu5v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to