Kai Schaetzl a écrit : > Craig McLean wrote on Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:02:47 +0000: > > >>I'll disagree with you here, I have had to contact the list-owner to get >>a dynamic address unsubscribed > > > You mean an address for which you sent email from dynamic IP space? > Honestly, and not meant to be offensive, but if you do that that's your > problem you should know better. I don't accept such mail either. And don't > tell me you cannot send mail another way. >
sometimes people's ISP gets listed (for good or bad reasons), and that can be a very frustrating situation. This may be considered as collateral damage, of course. but it's still annoying. > >>"It's surprising to me that the SA lists aren't just run through SA. > > > Well, ressource-wise it makes a difference if you run a million mails thru > SA or if you can unload 90% at MTA level and run only the remaining 100.000 > thru SA. This is absolutely true.... if you can find reliable RBLs. but unfortunately, this is not as easy as we would like. BTW is the list of subscribers available to the MTA, so that it can reject non subscribers at MTA time? that won't help with forgeries, but should reduce the load (not sure, but would be good to know if spammers target the list without forging a subscriber's address).
