Todd Merritt wrote:
> jdow wrote:
>
>> From: "Chris L. Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> Back in 2.64 There was the option to have SA stop going though
>>> rules then it hit a max score. Is there any option for this in
>>> 3.X.X ?
>>
>>
>> No. Such a rule actually costs processing time AND would create false
>> positives or false negatives entirely too easily.
>> {^_^}
>>
> If you grouped the rulesets into +/- sets and processed all the -
> rules first it wouldn't create false ly scored messages. Or would it
> ?
In theory... but serializing the tests would complicate parallel evaluation
significantly.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
