Alex,
        http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/
        I started w/ this tutorial to get some virtual domains working.

        It works well for those LOW traffic domains.
 Then I allowed postfix to relay some other domains to exchange 
(after sa and clamav told amavisd what's the score)
But this has some good scoop on amavis

Mike S

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Schrauder 
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:58 PM
> To: SpamAssassin Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions
> 
>  Alex,
>       Amavisd-new is the ticket.  I use it w/ sa and clamav.  
> Setting up the config for amavis was a real pain for me, but 
> it works great now.  
> I am trying to find the online tutorial that I used to set it up.
> Are you using it as a wall before mail gets to exchange?  
> That is what I am doing, but I have no 'per-user' whitelists 
> or tweakable settings.  I will try my best to answer any 
> questions you have, but I am linux challenged.
> 
> Mike S
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:32 AM
> > To: SpamAssassin Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions
> > 
> > Well that confirms my suspicion on it not doing Content-Checking 
> > (quarantining messages based on
> > content/attachments) - can anyone suggest something to do this?
> > 
> > From the tutorials I've been following it looks like SA 
> will hook into 
> > AV software (or vice versa) - I think the key is amavisd-new.
> > 
> > I tested telneting into ports 10024 and 10025 but 10024 
> can't connect
> > - could this indicate a problem or is that normal?
> > 
> > On 10/6/05, Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I was told that I can use spamassassin to do Content
> > Checking but I
> > > > see no evidence of it as yet.
> > >
> > > That may depend on what you mean by "content checking"
> > >
> > > SA is a tool for classifying spam.  You seem to have 
> tried it on a 
> > > virus.  A virus really isn't spam, it is a virus.  SA 
> makes little 
> > > attempt to catch virui, there are tools designed for that purpose.
> > > Now, if you want to catch messages about mortgage deals and
> > the latest
> > > popularity pills and sex clubs, then SA will do a nice job
> > for you once you have it set up right.
> > >
> > > It is important to realyse that SA is a *filter*.  It doesn;t DO 
> > > anything to the spam, other than add a score that indicates
> > how likely
> > > a message is to be spam.  Something else in your processing chain 
> > > needs to follow SA, look at the score, and decide what to
> > do with the
> > > mail.  If you don't have that, then all mail, spam
> > included, will get
> > > routed to the users.  However, the spam will be scored and
> > marked as
> > > spam in the subject line.  The user's mail client can then
> > usually filter on that if they want to.
> > >
> > > It sounds like you don't have SA properly integrated into
> > the rest of
> > > your mail system, and it isn't processing the messages.  
> > Unfortunately
> > > I don't recognize the tool you are using, so I can't 
> help.  Someone 
> > > else will probably be along soon that may be able to.
> > >
> > >         Loren
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to