Thanks! I'll take a look at this and see if I can figure out what's going on
On 10/7/05, Mike Schrauder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex, > http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/ > I started w/ this tutorial to get some virtual domains working. > > It works well for those LOW traffic domains. > Then I allowed postfix to relay some other domains to exchange > (after sa and clamav told amavisd what's the score) > But this has some good scoop on amavis > > Mike S > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Schrauder > > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:58 PM > > To: SpamAssassin Mailing List > > Subject: RE: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions > > > > Alex, > > Amavisd-new is the ticket. I use it w/ sa and clamav. > > Setting up the config for amavis was a real pain for me, but > > it works great now. > > I am trying to find the online tutorial that I used to set it up. > > Are you using it as a wall before mail gets to exchange? > > That is what I am doing, but I have no 'per-user' whitelists > > or tweakable settings. I will try my best to answer any > > questions you have, but I am linux challenged. > > > > Mike S > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:32 AM > > > To: SpamAssassin Mailing List > > > Subject: Re: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions > > > > > > Well that confirms my suspicion on it not doing Content-Checking > > > (quarantining messages based on > > > content/attachments) - can anyone suggest something to do this? > > > > > > From the tutorials I've been following it looks like SA > > will hook into > > > AV software (or vice versa) - I think the key is amavisd-new. > > > > > > I tested telneting into ports 10024 and 10025 but 10024 > > can't connect > > > - could this indicate a problem or is that normal? > > > > > > On 10/6/05, Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I was told that I can use spamassassin to do Content > > > Checking but I > > > > > see no evidence of it as yet. > > > > > > > > That may depend on what you mean by "content checking" > > > > > > > > SA is a tool for classifying spam. You seem to have > > tried it on a > > > > virus. A virus really isn't spam, it is a virus. SA > > makes little > > > > attempt to catch virui, there are tools designed for that purpose. > > > > Now, if you want to catch messages about mortgage deals and > > > the latest > > > > popularity pills and sex clubs, then SA will do a nice job > > > for you once you have it set up right. > > > > > > > > It is important to realyse that SA is a *filter*. It doesn;t DO > > > > anything to the spam, other than add a score that indicates > > > how likely > > > > a message is to be spam. Something else in your processing chain > > > > needs to follow SA, look at the score, and decide what to > > > do with the > > > > mail. If you don't have that, then all mail, spam > > > included, will get > > > > routed to the users. However, the spam will be scored and > > > marked as > > > > spam in the subject line. The user's mail client can then > > > usually filter on that if they want to. > > > > > > > > It sounds like you don't have SA properly integrated into > > > the rest of > > > > your mail system, and it isn't processing the messages. > > > Unfortunately > > > > I don't recognize the tool you are using, so I can't > > help. Someone > > > > else will probably be along soon that may be able to. > > > > > > > > Loren > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
