Nick Gilbert wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: > >> Nick Gilbert wrote: >> >>> I've just noticed that if I run: >>> >>> spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] < spam3.txt >>> or >>> spamc -u nick < spam3.txt >>> >>> I do NOT get the bayes results which I DO get if I run: >>> >>> spamassassin -t < spam3.txt. >>> >>> So perhaps the source of the problem is not simscan after all? Why would >>> spamassassin and spamc produce different results? >> >> >> >> Are you running spamassassin while logged in as "nick"? > > > Yes... But I presumed that the "-u nick" was designed to simulate that? >
Well that works with spamc, but not for spamassassin. ie: if you did that all while logged in as root, spamc would be using nick's bayes DB, but spamassassin would be using root's. Next question. Is your bayes DB SQL stored?
