We do use SPF in SpamAssassin here, but not in our MTA. The failure rate is still too high on some e-mail to enforce it here. But it is useful in scoring for us. Notwithstanding, I still felt it useful to answer his question since he may have legitimate reasons for not wanting to use it.
Bret > > I think that SpamAssassin uses SPF SoftFail to increase the Score of > the message, so I guess that, even if you have SPF working before it > is still valuable to have it working within SpamAssassin .. > > Does anybody agree on this? > > Regards, > Carlos. > > 2005/9/21, Bret Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > 1) Comment out (by putting # in front of the line) in init.pre: > > > > > > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF > > 2) Disable everything that uses it: bayes and autowhitelist. > > > > Bret > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:43 AM > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Subject: Disabling 3.1.0 features > > > > > > > > I thought I had read through all of the necessary and > available docs, but > > cannot find a way to > > > > 1) Disable SPF support (we already have that running without SA) > > > > 2) Disable DB_File (BerkeleyDB) support. We are having > huge problems > > getting DB_File running on our machine and really don't > need this,as we > > don't intend to use any Bayes stuff right now. > > > > Thanks for any help... > > > > >
