From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> (Quoted in full for Warren, the Fedora contact.)
>
> --On Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:06 AM -0700 jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >> Justin Mason wrote:
> >> > fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
> >> > http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
> >> >
> >> > totally unconfirmed, but worth noting in case that really is the
> >> > case.
> >>
> >> My copy of Fedora Core 4 has "required_hits 5" in local.cf using the
> >> distribution's RPM for Spamassassin.  rpm -Va made no complaints about
> >> the file.  Just to be sure, I uninstalled it, checked that local.cf was
> >> gone, and reinstalled it via yum.  Standard defaults.
> >>
> >> It looks to me like something other than Fedora Core was messing with
> >> his config.
> >
> > Naw, the basic SpamAssassin install for FC4 is, as I remarked, borked.
> > I could not make it work satisfactorily. Too many pieces were broken,
> > in the wrong places, or just plain missing. The know-it-alls who set
> > it up seem to have had to properly pee on it to make it their own. Rip
> > it out however you can with the rpm tool and install it, and 2.54 tonnes
> > of other required "stuff", via CPAN. It'll work a whole lot better.
>
> Did anybody bother to file a bugzilla? I don't see anything like the
> reported issue:
>
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?component=spamassassin>

Bugzilla is basically worthless. So if I can get an arrogant remark about
an annoyance with FC4 from one of the FC4 people responsible for that
annoyance I figure I can be excused for being far more interested in
making it work rather than filing bugzilla reports. (Searching Bugzilla
is like trying to find the right needle in a haystack in a dense fog of
wrong needles.)

{^_^}


Reply via email to