Ok  I spoke to our webmaster ,   what we concluded is that they are using the
display none code in the HTML to hide the rest of the "legitimate text" so
that SA wont see it as bad words, leaving us to see only the what they want.

Is there are way to have SA  scan the messages for display the display none
code? If display none is being used then it would be apparent that it is some
type of spam?

Does anyone see a problem with filtering display none?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 1:50 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Scoring 

As you are all aware I'm in my first few days of deployment , I'm pretty new
to this,

My inquiry was on the scoring , our presidents inbox received this message
And I'm wondering how it only scored 2.7 

The  odd part is that nothing in the header is what was written in the email



 From: "Ko Ricker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Deanna Phipps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My Girl Loves the New Mee
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 05:01:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0063_01C583A4.10396800"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Unsent: 1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "milter", has
        identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message
        has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
label
        similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
        the administrator of that system for details.
        Content preview:  Hello, Peter Blood waited a moment, observing him;
then
        he bowed andLord Julian considered him, and considering him his
        expressionhorror before the jeering ruffian whom he had slain, and
        otherlong, inactive waiting was straining the nerves of both
        Lordcomposed of French boucanhunters from Northern Hispaniola, men
        whohe instantly practised an unusual submission.Let that wait,
snapped
        Mr. Blood almost angrily. You've allMr. Pollexfen - a Whig at heart
        despite the position ofWhat was a day, after all? The Secretary's
        office might bePut down the helm, he commanded.ashamed of,
considering
        the provocation I received.flattered and humoured.one eye than do
most
        men with two; and despite his grizzled headCahusac would certainly
have
        adopted that course if only his men hadobbordunidy.he wrote. Although
        outnumbered by more than two to one in men, [...] 
        Content analysis details:   (2.7 points, 5.0 required)
        pts rule name              description
        ---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
        0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
        0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_83        BODY: 8alpha-pock-3alpha
        0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
        0.2 HTML_FONT_BIG          BODY: HTML tag for a big font size
        0.6 URIBL_SBL              Contains an URL listed in the SBL
blocklist
        [URIs: regardtomer.com]
        1.2 PRIORITY_NO_NAME       Message has priority, but no
X-Mailer/User-Agent
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

And what was actually displayed in the message ( in html)  when copy and
pasted  and converted to text was entirely different than what it showed.

I mean it had the V word the C word and all sorts 

 


 
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax:  212-941-5563
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Reply via email to