> > > URIBL tests are still hitting good here. > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > > FROM 2005-06-27 03:47:11 TO 2005-06-27 21:28:42 > > Hrm. Interesting. I turned the debug level up a bit and saw this: > > Jun 27 20:59:18 mailgate amavis[11145]: (11145-01) SPAM-TAG, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > c.com>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<tompkin > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Yes, hits=18.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6 > tests=[AMATEUR_PORN=0.769, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, > NOT_TO_ME=1, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=1.485, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.15, > RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH=0.618, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.655, > RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.137, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.531, > URIBL_AB_SURBL=2.007, URIBL_JP_SURBL=1.539, > URIBL_OB_SURBL=1.996, URIBL_SBL=0.629, URIBL_SC_SURBL=3.897, > URIBL_WS_SURBL=0.539] > > (Side note: this one user wants to have a wildcard email > address.. UGH.) > > Lots of URIBL hits there.. > > How strange! :( >
Just curious.. Are you using multi.uribl.com? d
