> >True, you might list associated domains. However, URIBLs still >aren't psychic, >they're just smart enough to do research :) > >However, the important point still remains: Time of check IS a >major factor when >talking about URIBLs. You cannot assume that two URIBL checks >are comparable if >they are made at different times. > >In particular, you can't assume a URIBL is being bypassed >because you got a >negative result when a message came in, but you get a positive >result when hand >checking the domain 1 hour later. You've changed two >variables, time of scan and >method of scan. > >It *might* be a strangely encoded message that's fooling SA, >but more likely >that 1hour was enough time for it to get listed.
True, and I'll take it one step further...not every mirror updates at the same time :) Only way to help the situation, is to go submit missed domains to URIBL.com, and will get right on it ;) --Chris
