It got tagged using this test but others keep coming in. is there anything else i can do to the spamcop_uri file to make it fire? other people on this list are tagging the same spam that in my system is going thru
thanks David B Funk wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Kern, Tom wrote: > >> Perhaps, I'm not sure. >> Is there a way to tell? >> Also, I have seen some go through that I know are in spamcop. >> >> Do you know of a way to troubleshoot spamcop? >> i plan on upgrading sa, but I can't just yet, so I'd like to figure >> this out. >> >> Thanks for your help > > Get a hotmail/yahoo/gmail free web-based mail account. > Send mail to your regular address containing the SURBL testpoint URL. > (IE "http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point. com" with out the space ) > This -should- be tagged, regardless. > > If it isn't start SA in debug mode (with the '-D') option and > retest, then look at the debug logs to see what did or did not > fire. Compare that with a spamassassin -D run to see what's > different. > > Note, you do not want to leave spamd running with the '-D' > option unless you have a very low volume mail server or -lots- > of free disk space. ;) > > See the SURBL FAQ for more info: http://www.surbl.org/faq.html
