On Monday, June 6, 2005, 7:42:51 AM, Jeff Chan wrote: > On Monday, June 6, 2005, 7:02:17 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: >> As someone else suggested, adding the uribl.com tests would also be >> helpful, but it's hard to say if uribl.com had that link listed at the time >> you got the message. SURBL lists the domain in AB, OB, SC and WS now, but >> none of them had it before. However, the more checks you use, the more >> chances you'll be checking the list that got it reported first.
> keystreams.com is not on any SURBLs currently. > Jeff C. Oops, 'scuse me, I see keystreams was for the sample spam and the spam URI domain is: firstitregistr.com Rest asured that SURBLs will shortly be detecting ones like this much more quickly. The new version of my engine probably would have gotten this one at: 2005-06-06 02:36 UTC Which would have been about 23 minutes after the Jun 5 19:13:25 (pacific time?) of the original poster's logs. That's for the sc.surbl.org list. The xs list might get it earlier. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
