>...
>List Mail User wrote:
>
>>
>> Again, I apologize for any implied offense - none was intended. (When
>> I mean to say bad things, I think that the archives will show I do not often
>> "mince" my words.) I only meant to point out I didn't do a "thorough" check
>> because none seemed to be necessary (i.e. keystreams immediately looked to be
>> an upright and legitimate company).
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Paul Shupak
>
>I have to admit, I was a bit shocked by your posting Paul. I've never seen you
>say anything as nice as:
>
> keystreams. com "seems" to be a legitimate hosting company
>
>Coming from you, high praise indeed. :)
>
Matt,
I often defend people in private, but I admit I much more commonly
blast people in public. You haven't seen the private defenses I've made
of known ROSKO spammers to various groups when I felt the wrong person or
organization was being blamed (though I do usually document who I think is
*really* responsible - usually another "well-known" spammer).
There is a large difference between being not guilty and being
innocent. I wanted to save Jeff et. al. any unneeded effort since indeed
keystreams did not even possibly qualify for SURBLs; If ChrisS had said
exactly the same thing, I would have dug more, because of the possiblity
of being "grey", but from what I did dig up, I'm pretty certain I still
wouldn't have found anything "bad".
The only reason for quotes around my use of seems, is that I do
make mistakes - but usually in the other direction (like when I got the
telco for Oslo Noway blacklisted for a day around the world - seems SBC
would/will not put through calls to prefix:10000000 - I didn't check well
enough and they have since changed their domain contacts to use a number
that can be called from North America).
Paul Shupak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
