On Sun, 2022-08-14 at 11:39 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > On 14/08/2022 02:38, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > 3) It would be rather trivial to return spam to sender with a > > suitable > > WTF, that has been a terrible idea since the 90s, given most spam is > spoofed, the end result of this will be your mail server getting the > poor reputation as source of backscatter and going into blacklists :) > greed - I don't do that, but almost as long as I've been on this list there have been advocates of it. As I said, I thought about it, but the effort of writing a filter to determine what, if anything should be bounced or rejected, has never seemed worth the effort for such a low volume mail used as myself.
Martin
