On 14/08/2022 22:37, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sun, 2022-08-14 at 11:39 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: On 14/08/2022
02:38, Martin Gregorie wrote:
3) It would be rather trivial to return spam to sender with a
suitable
WTF, that has been a terrible idea since the 90s, given most spam is
spoofed, the end result of this will be your mail server getting the
poor reputation as source of backscatter and going into blacklists :)
greed - I don't do that, but almost as long as I've been on this list
there have been advocates of it. As I said, I thought about it, but the
effort of writing a filter to determine what, if anything should be
bounced or rejected, has never seemed worth the effort for such a low
volume mail used as myself.
Martin
When people advocate for it, it goes to show the only thing they have
ever been responsible for is their own home mail server with accounts
for them and maybe a friend or two on it, never for anything commercial,
you've been around a great many years Martin, so I'm glad you resist the
temptation of the fools.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
