Thanks. You may find some assistance in contributing here https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-docs/how-to-contribute.adoc and here https://github.com/apache/solr/tree/main/dev-docs/ref-guide Ask here for help. And the Pull Request doesn't need to be perfect, it can be polished during review.
Jan > 13. nov. 2024 kl. 22:47 skrev Christine Feldmann > <cfeldm...@proofpoint.com.INVALID>: > > I haven’t yet contributed to the project but I should be able to figure that > out. I’ll get educated on the process and see if I can make it happen. > Thanks! > > From: Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>> > Reply-To: "users@solr.apache.org <mailto:users@solr.apache.org>" > <users@solr.apache.org <mailto:users@solr.apache.org>> > Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 at 4:22 PM > To: "users@solr.apache.org <mailto:users@solr.apache.org>" > <users@solr.apache.org <mailto:users@solr.apache.org>> > Subject: Re: Does lack of documentation indicate lack of support or just lack > of documentation? > > Never heard of such intent, likely a miss? Would you be willing to produce a > Pull Request for bringing the content back? Jan Høydahl > On 13 Nov 2024, at > 22: 03, Christine Feldmann <cfeldmann@ proofpoint. com. invalid> wrote: > > > > > Never heard of such intent, likely a miss? Would you be willing to produce a > Pull Request for bringing the content back? > > > > Jan Høydahl > > > >> On 13 Nov 2024, at 22:03, Christine Feldmann >> <cfeldm...@proofpoint.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> Looking for opinions here from those of you that know Solr best… > >> > >> A change was pushed to do a major revision of the Streaming Expressions >> guide almost 4 years ago in version 8.8: >> SOLR-13105<https://urldefense.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_SOLR-2D13105&d=DwIFaQ&c=Vxt5e0Osvvt2gflwSlsJ5DmPGcPvTRKLJyp031rXjhg&r=Z5eBKEaiuUFNG8HpjSz8IMDVdE51EhIEeAVWCJN74gY&m=SO3LQE6JmrHvOEeReChQNGw6Wr-qxiC6a0g-DZjNQc_dQi6bcMN1mBa8Y-RukmAd&s=wevHDVx3HmSX0XVNlxdqDZ14vY_Xnlp5kOtE2lQBv28&e=> >> A visual guide to Solr Math Expressions and Streaming Expressions > >> > >> In this change, the following section was removed: > >> > >> “Adding Custom Expressions > >> Creating your own custom expressions can be easily done by implementing the >> Expressible<https://urldefense.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lucene.apache.org_solr_8-5F5-5F0_solr-2Dsolrj_org_apache_solr_client_solrj_io_stream_expr_Expressible.html&d=DwIFaQ&c=Vxt5e0Osvvt2gflwSlsJ5DmPGcPvTRKLJyp031rXjhg&r=Z5eBKEaiuUFNG8HpjSz8IMDVdE51EhIEeAVWCJN74gY&m=SO3LQE6JmrHvOEeReChQNGw6Wr-qxiC6a0g-DZjNQc_dQi6bcMN1mBa8Y-RukmAd&s=X7MJTUSRrRYq0r18cEYkDMfZo-D_QXXClnhoU0XZqkA&e=> >> interface. To add a custom expression to the list of known mappings for the >> /stream and /graph handlers, you just need to declare it as a plugin in >> solrconfig.xml via: > >> <expressible name="custom" class="org.example.CustomStreamingExpression"/>” > >> > >> There was no mention of deprecating the feature or removing this section. >> Given the massive size of the diff, I wonder if it was an inadvertent >> removal. > >> > >> The feature works. There’s no deprecation of this feature mentioned in any >> of the Solr docs since it was removed from the guide without explanation. >> The code itself is not deprecated. > >> > >> The Config API doc still includes >> add-expressible/update-expressible/delete-expressible > >> > >> There is concern in my organization that this feature could be removed at >> any time without warning because it didn’t make it into the revision of the >> guide. > >> > >> Can anyone provide an opinion on how likely that is to happen? > >> > >> If any of the authors of the guide update are reading, can you comment on >> why that section was removed? > >> > >> Thanks in advance, > >> Christine
