Thanks a lot for taking time to answer. I'll have to figure out a work around, decreasing mm is not an option for me, maybe use a boost for this extra field.
Best regards, Elisabeth Le mar. 14 nov. 2023 à 12:05, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> a écrit : > Ok. Right > (one two three four five six seven)~7 means match all of them ie in fact > +one > +two +three +four +five +six +seven > Here we can see that how dismax handles fields with different analyzers is > far from perfection. > You can either decrease mm > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/6_6/the-dismax-query-parser.html#TheDisMaxQueryParser-Themm_MinimumShouldMatch_Parameter > or experiment with mm.autoRelax=true > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/6_6/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#TheExtendedDisMaxQueryParser-Themm.autoRelaxParameter > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:33 PM elisabeth benoit < > elisaelisael...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > okay, thanks, for the answer. the thing is > > > > when there is no *wordf**ield* in the *qf* param, but only *edgefield1* > and > > *edgefield2*, I get this parsedQuery > > > > parsedQuery = > > +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | edgefield2:musee)) > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 | edgefield2:maillol)) > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61)) > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r)) > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 | edgefield2:grenelle)) > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007)) > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | edgefield2:paris)))~7 > > > > and SolR does return documents > > > > but when I have instead* wordf**ield* and *edgefield* in *qf*, I get > this > > parsedQuery > > > > parsedQuery = > > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol > wordfield:61 > > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle > > > wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee > > > edgefield:maillol > > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007 > > > edgefield:paris)~7)))" > > > > and SolR does not return any documents. > > > > That is what makes me thing there is something wrong with the second > > parsedQuery. > > > > Best regards, > > Elisabeth > > > > > > > > Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 20:15, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> a > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > the first case listed in my mail > > > > parsedQuery = > > > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol > > wordfield:61 > > > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle > > > > wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee > > > > edgefield:maillol > > > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007 > > > > edgefield:paris)~7)))" > > > > > > > > > > The OR is different, it is all words must match wordfield OR all > words > > > must > > > > match edgefield, but no mix between the two fields are allowed. > > > > > > > > > It doesn't work this way. These two queries differs only in > > scoring/results > > > ordering. i.e > > > this query matches docs: {wordfield:musee, edgefield:musee} as well > as { > > > wordfield:musee,edgefield:maillol}, {wordfield:musee}, { > > > edgefield:maillol}. > > > This explanation might be useful > > > https://lucidworks.com/post/solr-boolean-operators/ > > > Note: DisMax works like OR/| but takes max instead of sum as a score. > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 7:21 PM elisabeth benoit < > > > elisaelisael...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Thanks for your answer. > > > > > > > > I mean that in the second case listed in my mail, the query is > > > > parsedQuery = > > > > +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | edgefield2:musee)) > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 | edgefield2:maillol)) > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61)) > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r)) > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 | > edgefield2:grenelle)) > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007)) > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | edgefield2:paris)))~7 > > > > > > > > and so the way I read it is "musee" can match edgefield1 OR > edgefield2, > > > > "maillol" can match edgefield1 OR edgefield2, and so on, so solr can > > > return > > > > a doc where some query words match with edgefield1 and some other > query > > > > words with edgefield2. > > > > > > > > But in the first case listed in my mail > > > > > > > > parsedQuery = > > > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol > > wordfield:61 > > > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle > > > > wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee > > > > edgefield:maillol > > > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007 > > > > edgefield:paris)~7)))" > > > > > > > > The OR is different, it is all words must match wordfield OR all > words > > > must > > > > match edgefield, but no mix between the two fields are allowed. > > > > > > > > So I cannot search both fields at the same time. > > > > > > > > I hope this is clear! > > > > > > > > I would like to search both fields in same query. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Elisabeth > > > > > > > > Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 17:02, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > Hello Elisabeth. > > > > > DisMax analyses user input across the given qf fields. If the > number > > of > > > > > resulting tokens are different it can't apply defaults logic - per > > word > > > > sum > > > > > over per field maximums; and flips to max over sums. The good news > is > > > > that > > > > > the difference between two approaches is only scoring. > > > > > WDYM exactly by absence of "matching words to be in two different > > > > fields"? > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 5:01 PM elisabeth benoit < > > > > > elisaelisael...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am using solr 7.3.1 with ExtendedDismaxQParser. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a edgengrams field and a normal text field. When I mix > those > > > two > > > > > in > > > > > > the same query, ie *qf=edgefield wordfield* and use option > > > > > *debugQuery=on*, > > > > > > I see that the parsedQuery is different, ie all words should > match > > > the > > > > > same > > > > > > field. > > > > > > > > > > > > ie parsedQuery = > > > > > > > > > > > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol > > > wordfield:61 > > > > > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) > wordfield:grenelle > > > > > > wordfield > > > > > > :75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee > > edgefield:maillol > > > > > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007 > > edgefield > > > > > > :paris)~7)))" > > > > > > > > > > > > When instead I use two edgefields with *qf=**edgefield1 > > **edgefield2* > > > > > > > > > > > > parsedQuery = > > > > > > +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | > edgefield2:musee)) > > > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 | > > edgefield2:maillol)) > > > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61)) > > > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r)) > > > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 | > > > edgefield2:grenelle)) > > > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007)) > > > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | > edgefield2:paris)))~7 > > > > > > > > > > > > In the second case, edismax allows matching words to be in two > > > > different > > > > > > fields, but not in first case. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to have the same behaviour, ie case two, in all > > cases? > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards, > > > > > > Elisabeth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sincerely yours > > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sincerely yours > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev >
