>
> the first case listed in my mail
> parsedQuery =
> "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol wordfield:61
> Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle
> wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee
> edgefield:maillol
> edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007
> edgefield:paris)~7)))"
> The OR is different, it is all words must match wordfield OR all words must
> match edgefield, but no mix between the two fields are allowed.
It doesn't work this way. These two queries differs only in scoring/results
ordering. i.e
this query matches docs: {wordfield:musee, edgefield:musee} as well as {
wordfield:musee,edgefield:maillol}, {wordfield:musee}, {
edgefield:maillol}.
This explanation might be useful
https://lucidworks.com/post/solr-boolean-operators/
Note: DisMax works like OR/| but takes max instead of sum as a score.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 7:21 PM elisabeth benoit <elisaelisael...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> I mean that in the second case listed in my mail, the query is
> parsedQuery =
> +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | edgefield2:musee))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 | edgefield2:maillol))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 | edgefield2:grenelle))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | edgefield2:paris)))~7
>
> and so the way I read it is "musee" can match edgefield1 OR edgefield2,
> "maillol" can match edgefield1 OR edgefield2, and so on, so solr can return
> a doc where some query words match with edgefield1 and some other query
> words with edgefield2.
>
> But in the first case listed in my mail
>
> parsedQuery =
> "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol wordfield:61
> Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle
> wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee
> edgefield:maillol
> edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007
> edgefield:paris)~7)))"
>
> The OR is different, it is all words must match wordfield OR all words must
> match edgefield, but no mix between the two fields are allowed.
>
> So I cannot search both fields at the same time.
>
> I hope this is clear!
>
> I would like to search both fields in same query.
>
> Best regards,
> Elisabeth
>
> Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 17:02, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> > Hello Elisabeth.
> > DisMax analyses user input across the given qf fields. If the number of
> > resulting tokens are different it can't apply defaults logic - per word
> sum
> > over per field maximums; and flips to max over sums. The good news is
> that
> > the difference between two approaches is only scoring.
> > WDYM exactly by absence of "matching words to be in two different
> fields"?
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 5:01 PM elisabeth benoit <
> > elisaelisael...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am using solr 7.3.1 with ExtendedDismaxQParser.
> > >
> > > I have a edgengrams field and a normal text field. When I mix those two
> > in
> > > the same query, ie *qf=edgefield wordfield* and use option
> > *debugQuery=on*,
> > > I see that the parsedQuery is different, ie all words should match the
> > same
> > > field.
> > >
> > > ie parsedQuery =
> > >
> > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol wordfield:61
> > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle
> > > wordfield
> > > :75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee edgefield:maillol
> > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007 edgefield
> > > :paris)~7)))"
> > >
> > > When instead I use two edgefields with *qf=**edgefield1 **edgefield2*
> > >
> > > parsedQuery =
> > > +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | edgefield2:musee))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 | edgefield2:maillol))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 | edgefield2:grenelle))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | edgefield2:paris)))~7
> > >
> > > In the second case, edismax allows matching words to be in two
> different
> > > fields, but not in first case.
> > >
> > > Is there a way to have the same behaviour, ie case two, in all cases?
> > >
> > > best regards,
> > > Elisabeth
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
