Ok. Right
(one two three four five six seven)~7 means match all of them ie in fact +one
+two +three +four +five +six +seven
Here we can see that how dismax handles fields with different analyzers is
far from perfection.
You can either decrease mm
https://solr.apache.org/guide/6_6/the-dismax-query-parser.html#TheDisMaxQueryParser-Themm_MinimumShouldMatch_Parameter
or experiment with mm.autoRelax=true
https://solr.apache.org/guide/6_6/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#TheExtendedDisMaxQueryParser-Themm.autoRelaxParameter
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:33 PM elisabeth benoit <elisaelisael...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> okay, thanks, for the answer. the thing is
>
> when there is no *wordf**ield* in the *qf* param, but only *edgefield1* and
> *edgefield2*, I get this parsedQuery
>
> parsedQuery =
> +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | edgefield2:musee))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 | edgefield2:maillol))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 | edgefield2:grenelle))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | edgefield2:paris)))~7
>
> and SolR does return documents
>
> but when I have instead* wordf**ield* and *edgefield* in *qf*, I get this
> parsedQuery
>
> parsedQuery =
> > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol wordfield:61
> > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle
> > wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee
> > edgefield:maillol
> > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007
> > edgefield:paris)~7)))"
>
> and SolR does not return any documents.
>
> That is what makes me thing there is something wrong with the second
> parsedQuery.
>
> Best regards,
> Elisabeth
>
>
>
> Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 20:15, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> > >
> > > the first case listed in my mail
> > > parsedQuery =
> > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol
> wordfield:61
> > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle
> > > wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee
> > > edgefield:maillol
> > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007
> > > edgefield:paris)~7)))"
> >
> >
> > > The OR is different, it is all words must match wordfield OR all words
> > must
> > > match edgefield, but no mix between the two fields are allowed.
> >
> >
> > It doesn't work this way. These two queries differs only in
> scoring/results
> > ordering. i.e
> > this query matches docs: {wordfield:musee, edgefield:musee} as well as {
> > wordfield:musee,edgefield:maillol}, {wordfield:musee}, {
> > edgefield:maillol}.
> > This explanation might be useful
> > https://lucidworks.com/post/solr-boolean-operators/
> > Note: DisMax works like OR/| but takes max instead of sum as a score.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 7:21 PM elisabeth benoit <
> > elisaelisael...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your answer.
> > >
> > > I mean that in the second case listed in my mail, the query is
> > > parsedQuery =
> > > +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | edgefield2:musee))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 | edgefield2:maillol))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 | edgefield2:grenelle))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | edgefield2:paris)))~7
> > >
> > > and so the way I read it is "musee" can match edgefield1 OR edgefield2,
> > > "maillol" can match edgefield1 OR edgefield2, and so on, so solr can
> > return
> > > a doc where some query words match with edgefield1 and some other query
> > > words with edgefield2.
> > >
> > > But in the first case listed in my mail
> > >
> > > parsedQuery =
> > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol
> wordfield:61
> > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle
> > > wordfield:75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee
> > > edgefield:maillol
> > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007
> > > edgefield:paris)~7)))"
> > >
> > > The OR is different, it is all words must match wordfield OR all words
> > must
> > > match edgefield, but no mix between the two fields are allowed.
> > >
> > > So I cannot search both fields at the same time.
> > >
> > > I hope this is clear!
> > >
> > > I would like to search both fields in same query.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Elisabeth
> > >
> > > Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 17:02, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hello Elisabeth.
> > > > DisMax analyses user input across the given qf fields. If the number
> of
> > > > resulting tokens are different it can't apply defaults logic - per
> word
> > > sum
> > > > over per field maximums; and flips to max over sums. The good news is
> > > that
> > > > the difference between two approaches is only scoring.
> > > > WDYM exactly by absence of "matching words to be in two different
> > > fields"?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 5:01 PM elisabeth benoit <
> > > > elisaelisael...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am using solr 7.3.1 with ExtendedDismaxQParser.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a edgengrams field and a normal text field. When I mix those
> > two
> > > > in
> > > > > the same query, ie *qf=edgefield wordfield* and use option
> > > > *debugQuery=on*,
> > > > > I see that the parsedQuery is different, ie all words should match
> > the
> > > > same
> > > > > field.
> > > > >
> > > > > ie parsedQuery =
> > > > >
> > > > > "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((((wordfield:musee wordfield:maillol
> > wordfield:61
> > > > > Synonym(wordfield:r wordfield:ru wordfield:rue) wordfield:grenelle
> > > > > wordfield
> > > > > :75007 wordfield:paris)~7)^1.1 | ((edgefield:musee
> edgefield:maillol
> > > > > edgefield:61 edgefield:r edgefield:grenelle edgefield:75007
> edgefield
> > > > > :paris)~7)))"
> > > > >
> > > > > When instead I use two edgefields with *qf=**edgefield1
> **edgefield2*
> > > > >
> > > > > parsedQuery =
> > > > > +(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:musee)^1.1 | edgefield2:musee))
> > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:maillol)^1.1 |
> edgefield2:maillol))
> > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:61)^1.1 | edgefield2:61))
> > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:r)^1.1 | edgefield2:r))
> > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:grenelle)^1.1 |
> > edgefield2:grenelle))
> > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:75007)^1.1 | edgefield2:75007))
> > > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((edgefield1:paris)^1.1 | edgefield2:paris)))~7
> > > > >
> > > > > In the second case, edismax allows matching words to be in two
> > > different
> > > > > fields, but not in first case.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a way to have the same behaviour, ie case two, in all
> cases?
> > > > >
> > > > > best regards,
> > > > > Elisabeth
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
