Your decision will be the best. I do not have enough experience on pdfbox.
Le lun. 19 déc. 2022 à 12:53, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a écrit : > On 18.12.2022 14:58, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > > Hey, thanks a lot for your help. > > I just added > > > > t.setPage(page); > > > > in my method addAnnotation > > Do you think it should be added in pdfbox when we do : > > > > page.setAnnotations(annotations); > > I'm undecided - this is called very often and I wonder if we're > modifying PDFs that we're loading. (But I tried it and build worked > fine) The next best idea would be to put out a warning, but this could > come when flattening PDFs that we get and people get scared and make > support requests. > > Tilman > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 20:01, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> a > > écrit : > > > >> Thanks a lot for your help. > >> > >> Have a good weekend > >> > >> I am afraid that I am not going to get an answer... > >> > >> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022, 14:47, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a > >> écrit : > >> > >>> I thought the visual / non visual signature isn't the problem, that > there > >>> is some unknown difference between what you use for the second > signature > >>> and what I use, but then... > >>> > >>> It just got weirder! I reopened the file I mentioned in my last post > and > >>> now it looks like this: > >>> > >>> This is definitively some Adobe weirdness. You should report it there. > >>> Alternatively / Additionally, try asking on stackoverflow or related > site > >>> if anybody has an idea what happened. > >>> > >>> Tilman > >>> > >>> On 17.12.2022 13:51, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks again. > >>> > >>> Yes sorry, the test is not exactly the same, because our tool is now > >>> using visual signature. If necessary I can change the code to have > >>> invisible signature... > >>> > >>> What can I do to go forward or help or...? > >>> > >>> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022, 13:43, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a > >>> écrit : > >>> > >>>> Thanks for trying this. This time the first signature is a visual > >>>> signature. The stamp annotation object is 129, and my analysis is the > same: > >>>> that object was never provided in another incremental save, so I > don't know > >>>> why Adobe claims it was changed. > >>>> > >>>> And it gets weirder: > >>>> I used NOTEPAD++ to get the previous revision of your last document. > >>>> Then I signed that one with PDFBox example (latest 3.0 snapshot) and I > >>>> don't have the effect you mention, only a complaint that my signature > is > >>>> self-certified. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Tilman > >>>> > >>>> On 17.12.2022 12:54, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > >>>> > >>>> So I tried again with a PDF without a signature. > >>>> I switch the jar on the tool that sign the PDF to use the snapshot > >>>> I send the pdf to the tool to have a first signature > >>>> I used my java program to add an annotation > >>>> I send again the pdf to the tool for a second signature > >>>> > >>>> I still have the same behavior :(. > >>>> This is the final PDF : > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CV7lJ8dY1gDcx3rgHoW5yHJ612JSAK9B/view?usp=share_link > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 12:27, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> > <fravet...@vikta.com> a > >>>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> OK so my test was useless. I will try again > >>>> > >>>> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022, 11:30, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> > <thaush...@t-online.de> a > >>>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 17.12.2022 11:19, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Maybe I did not understand well. > >>>> > >>>> Should I use the snapshot version before the first signature ? > >>>> > >>>> You should use the snapshot to create the first signature, that's > what I > >>>> meant. > >>>> > >>>> My hope is that this Adobe behavior is related to that bug. > >>>> > >>>> No, the bug fix does not help with a document that already has that > >>>> signature. > >>>> > >>>> Tilman > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Or the goal of the bug fix is to manage a document that contains this > >>>> > >>>> kind > >>>> > >>>> of initial signature which is invisible ? (which was my test, so it > >>>> > >>>> means > >>>> > >>>> the bug is not fix, or I did not test it correctly or this is another > >>>> > >>>> use > >>>> > >>>> case) > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Fred > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 05:16, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> > <thaush...@t-online.de> a > >>>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> That new PDF also has that the initial signature does not appear in > the > >>>> page annotations (which was the bug fixed in the issue). > >>>> > >>>> Tilman > >>>> > >>>> On 16.12.2022 20:56, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I tried to switch the jar on the environment where there is the > >>>> > >>>> application > >>>> > >>>> that sign the PDF in order to use the snapshot. > >>>> Here the pdf I got : > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwV0i3SCQrqxRICpVWhbR09Of2FD0Ur7/view?usp=sharing > >>>> > >>>> But it looks the same in acrobat :(. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Fred > >>>> > >>>> Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:19, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> > <fravet...@vikta.com> > >>>> > >>>> a > >>>> > >>>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I read the issue too quickly. > >>>> The problem is on DSS side, and the jar file should be modified on my > >>>> provider side. I will see if we can perform this test on a dev > >>>> > >>>> environment. > >>>> > >>>> Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:06, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> > <thaush...@t-online.de> > >>>> > >>>> a > >>>> > >>>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 16.12.2022 12:59, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Good idea, I can try to use the latest snapshot jar. Is there a > >>>> snapshot build (jar) available? > >>>> > >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/pdfbox/pdfbox-app/2.0.28-SNAPSHOT/ > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >
