Hey, thanks a lot for your help. I just added t.setPage(page);
in my method addAnnotation Do you think it should be added in pdfbox when we do : page.setAnnotations(annotations); Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 20:01, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> a écrit : > Thanks a lot for your help. > > Have a good weekend > > I am afraid that I am not going to get an answer... > > Le sam. 17 déc. 2022, 14:47, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a > écrit : > >> I thought the visual / non visual signature isn't the problem, that there >> is some unknown difference between what you use for the second signature >> and what I use, but then... >> >> It just got weirder! I reopened the file I mentioned in my last post and >> now it looks like this: >> >> This is definitively some Adobe weirdness. You should report it there. >> Alternatively / Additionally, try asking on stackoverflow or related site >> if anybody has an idea what happened. >> >> Tilman >> >> On 17.12.2022 13:51, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >> >> Thanks again. >> >> Yes sorry, the test is not exactly the same, because our tool is now >> using visual signature. If necessary I can change the code to have >> invisible signature... >> >> What can I do to go forward or help or...? >> >> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022, 13:43, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a >> écrit : >> >>> Thanks for trying this. This time the first signature is a visual >>> signature. The stamp annotation object is 129, and my analysis is the same: >>> that object was never provided in another incremental save, so I don't know >>> why Adobe claims it was changed. >>> >>> And it gets weirder: >>> I used NOTEPAD++ to get the previous revision of your last document. >>> Then I signed that one with PDFBox example (latest 3.0 snapshot) and I >>> don't have the effect you mention, only a complaint that my signature is >>> self-certified. >>> >>> >>> Tilman >>> >>> On 17.12.2022 12:54, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >>> >>> So I tried again with a PDF without a signature. >>> I switch the jar on the tool that sign the PDF to use the snapshot >>> I send the pdf to the tool to have a first signature >>> I used my java program to add an annotation >>> I send again the pdf to the tool for a second signature >>> >>> I still have the same behavior :(. >>> This is the final PDF >>> :https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CV7lJ8dY1gDcx3rgHoW5yHJ612JSAK9B/view?usp=share_link >>> >>> >>> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 12:27, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> >>> <fravet...@vikta.com> a >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> OK so my test was useless. I will try again >>> >>> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022, 11:30, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> >>> <thaush...@t-online.de> a >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> On 17.12.2022 11:19, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >>> >>> Maybe I did not understand well. >>> >>> Should I use the snapshot version before the first signature ? >>> >>> You should use the snapshot to create the first signature, that's what I >>> meant. >>> >>> My hope is that this Adobe behavior is related to that bug. >>> >>> No, the bug fix does not help with a document that already has that >>> signature. >>> >>> Tilman >>> >>> >>> >>> Or the goal of the bug fix is to manage a document that contains this >>> >>> kind >>> >>> of initial signature which is invisible ? (which was my test, so it >>> >>> means >>> >>> the bug is not fix, or I did not test it correctly or this is another >>> >>> use >>> >>> case) >>> >>> Thanks >>> Fred >>> >>> >>> >>> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 05:16, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> >>> <thaush...@t-online.de> a >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> That new PDF also has that the initial signature does not appear in the >>> page annotations (which was the bug fixed in the issue). >>> >>> Tilman >>> >>> On 16.12.2022 20:56, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >>> >>> I tried to switch the jar on the environment where there is the >>> >>> application >>> >>> that sign the PDF in order to use the snapshot. >>> Here the pdf I got : >>> >>> >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwV0i3SCQrqxRICpVWhbR09Of2FD0Ur7/view?usp=sharing >>> >>> But it looks the same in acrobat :(. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Fred >>> >>> Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:19, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> >>> <fravet...@vikta.com> >>> >>> a >>> >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> I read the issue too quickly. >>> The problem is on DSS side, and the jar file should be modified on my >>> provider side. I will see if we can perform this test on a dev >>> >>> environment. >>> >>> Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:06, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> >>> <thaush...@t-online.de> >>> >>> a >>> >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> On 16.12.2022 12:59, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >>> >>> Good idea, I can try to use the latest snapshot jar. Is there a >>> snapshot build (jar) available? >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/pdfbox/pdfbox-app/2.0.28-SNAPSHOT/ >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >> >> >>
