It sounds like you will be making major bug bounty savings. Even if you offered $40 per bug.
Although an IT professional who had the where abouts to tackle a bug probably wouldn't swat a real fly for 40 bux let alone a virtual bug. Z. https://www.backbutton.co.uk/ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ♡۶♡۶ ♡۶ On Sat, 23 Jan 2021, 17:28 Som Lima, <somplastic...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-JSF-Java-Applications/dp/1484233867 > > This book is on par with any professional $3000 per week course. > > for example He explains broken IDE setup errors and solutions which are > relevant even with latest software versions, three years later. > > With this book he has left no excuse to log on to an emailing list like > this and ask why the right compiler isn't compiling. > > He has everything covered and it really does take you from novice to > professional. > > Even the helloworld uses features I have not seen anywhere else in the > intros. > > Thanks mate ! for the heads up. > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, 07:25 nikita.zinov...@gmail.com, < > nikita.zinov...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Will, that is a really interesting read, thank you! >> >> Speaking of modern JSF, I really enjoyed reading a 2018 book: >> "The Definitive Guide to JSF in Java EE 8: Building Web Applications >> with JavaServer Faces 1st ed. Edition" >> by Scholtz, Bauke, Tijms, Arjan >> Here's one of the links to it >> >> https://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-JSF-Java-Applications/dp/1484233867 >> >> It covers modern enhancements and quite a bit of complicated history of >> JSF. >> >> --- >> In one of our projects we nicely used a combination of >> https://freemarker.apache.org/ as a templating engine >> and JAX-RS, but I didn't like the fact that freemarker does not >> support Expression Language (JSR 341, >> https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=341), >> I think this fits into the action framework concept. >> >> But I also tend to think JSF 2.1+, especially 2.3+ is a good choice, >> although it takes some time to learn but there are nice textbooks on >> it! >> >> My 2 cents, >> >> Nikita >> >> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 18:50, Will Hartung <willhart...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:31 AM Som Lima <somplastic...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> My concerns layed to rest with my direction set. >> >> >> >> I feel I must ask one more question from this knowledge pool. A bonus >> question if you please. >> >> >> >> It is my understanding struts is a competitor to spring but I don't >> believe >> >> It is part of EE. >> >> >> >> Where does struts1 + 2 fit into the Big picture you guys painted ? >> > >> > >> > Formally, Struts in any form has nothing to with JEE. It's only a >> competitor to a portion of Spring. >> > >> > Struts 1 needs to die in a fire. It should remain only to be held up as >> an example of things not to do, especially today. It's single claim to fame >> back in the day was simply that it arrived first. Struts 1 is awful, IMHO. >> Modern JSP and Servlets alone are far better, and there are much better >> frameworks. Struts II is a vast improvement and related to Strut 1 in name >> only. I would put them both aside, frankly. >> > >> > In JEE, you have JSP 2.x + Servlets and JSF. JSP 2.x is, IMHO, one of >> the finest web application templating systems out there. JSP + Tag files + >> Expresion Language is really powerful. If you want a templating language >> for other things, JSP is a rough fit. But if you want one for web pages, >> it's really remarkable. >> > >> > That said, modern JSF is really amazing. It's really powerful, but it >> certainly comes with complexity. JSF is a true modular and component based >> framework that scary powerful abstractions can be laid upon. Most people >> don't take it there, but the underlying capability is there. If you were to >> go with a more server side rendering system, JSF is very viable. >> > >> > There's been calls for a JEE standard MVC framework. Struts II was >> considered an MVC framework. The term "Action Framework" is another term of >> art for it. That effort stalled and derailed when Oracle dumped JEE on to >> the world. I don't know the current status. Spring has an action/MVC >> framework as well. JAX-RS with a little work is a pretty usable action >> framework. >> > >> > Today, most folks seem to trend to javascript heavy, single page apps >> with JSON backend services. In that case, you don't need much of anything >> server side. I can not speak to those, as that's not my area of expertise. >> As a rule, I find most modern webapps to be not very good. There needs to >> be a balance between the heavy pages and static pages with live controls. >> In that realm, I think JSF is a better fit, but I have not worked on such >> an app in some time. >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Will Hartung >> >
