Am 01.04.2013 14:47, schrieb Noah Cutler: > I'm confused over the whole separate /usr partition is broken thing: > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken > > Everything appears to work swimmingly here after 1 month of use -- separate > /usr partition does not appear to be > broken...anymore??
maybe, maybe not, it is not well tested at all > Just trying to future proof my setup; if it's better to merge /usr into > rootfs, so be it, better to do it early > days with the new system. > > Otherwise, if someone can chime in here with some sage partitioning advice as > to how to proceed moving forward with > Fedora, that would be much appreciated. > > FWIW, as a beginner the benefits I see in a diverse micro-managed > partitioning scheme (vs. the mega partition) is > being able to fsck quickly; clone partitions quickly (e.g. copy to additional > disks), and prevent runaway logs and > the like (there are likely others) it makes ZERO sense to split /usr to a own partition you owuld really clone a partition containing the whole system or share it with another setup without the depending RPM database which lives in /var/lib/rpm/? sorry but the idea of a seperate /usr is broken at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
