Am 25.02.2013 22:47, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > who needs political reasons in software-development? > > things are fine and working or not > yes, so easy the world could be > > it would be easy to drive with sytemd the Radhat way and let other > distributions decide if they use sysVinit forever or follow this way > > You are self-contradicting. Driving systemd "the Red Hat way" would be a > political decision. systemd developers > specifically don't want to do that at all. They want to make technically > good decisions and sometimes that means > looking at what other distributions are doing and adopting the good parts. > Sometimes, that means coming up with > new configuration file formats or locations
in other words: we are changing things for EVERYBODY so that no one can complain it was changed only for him - technical nonsense sometimes it feels more developers have contracts with book wirters to give a godd reason to buy the next version of a book because you can throw away all existing ones there where books written in 1998 which where perfectly until 2006/2007 and mostly 2009, they contained informations which where valid for decades and now things are chnages each month - and this is the right direction? it is NOT! this has NOTHING to do with the unix paradigms
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
