Hi
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>wrote: > > > Am 25.02.2013 22:09, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > > > > I am not sure why the stock quote is consider a useful argument here. > Distributions are already adopting this. > > and why "they" are not adopting /etc/sysconfig? > You will have to ask them for specific reasons. As a general trend, different distributions have over a period of time come up with various configuration files and formats to do the same thing which leads to pointless differences and makes it a fragile development platform for any third party developer. Adoption to a neutral location is easier than asking them to buy into /etc/sysconfig on the whole because of the legacy involved, for both technical (non extensible file formats, distro specific quirks) and political reasons (why should we adopt a Red Hat or SUSE decision etc). For distributions using systemd, a change like this is easier to adopt now because they have already bought into the benefits of systemd and compatibility has been maintained during the transition period. Rahul
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
