El jue, 30-08-2012 a las 14:56 -0400, Don Levey escribió:
> > > > No. Given the choice, I'd rather have an updated/upgraded version of > > Thunderbird, especially if there are important security patches, because > > I can't think of an add-on that's more important than that. Be glad > > that Thunderbird does check after an update and lets you know what, if > > any of your add-ons aren't compatible. > > Knowing that an update would invalidate an extension would in no way > prevent you from installing the update if you chose to do so. But not > knowing that one's extension will no longer work until after > installation causes some people to delay installation for longer than > necessary, until they know for certain via external sources that there > is an extension that will work. I tend to prefer information. YMMV. > -Don I agree. Is happening now to me. Because I lose some addons in the last Firefox update, I rather wait for updating Thunderbird. Anyway, it works fine to me. Just my point of view Lailah
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
