On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 20:56 -0700, JD wrote: > FWIW, perhaps - just perhaps - this is an attempt by MS and redhat > (and perhaps others like Oracle), to try an convince government > customers that a system with a signed bootloader and kernel and > modules, provides for such greater security, that the gov should spend > the money to revamp all their installations.
Given Microsoft's past history (decades of it), I find it very hard to believe that anything that /they/ think is a good idea, is a good idea. Their track record for security is abysmal, likewise with usability. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
