FWIW, perhaps - just perhaps - this is an attempt by MS and redhat (and perhaps others like Oracle), to try an convince government customers that a system with a signed bootloader and kernel and modules, provides for such greater security, that the gov should spend the money to revamp all their installations.
Given the atmosphere we live in today (be it real or fabricated), and if my supposition re: the motive for a signed bootloader are true, then it seems the strategy might just work - and the colluding parties will get rich off of the taxpayers of course. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
