(replying to several; addressing COW)

For some strange reason, I feel like the ingredients for some dish:
sliced and diced!
(just kidding)

(me)

I have no real use for either feature.  They add complexity and risk, and slow things down.

I was referring to compression more than to COW.

All use that I make of copying ("cp", not "mv") is either
* so I can then change the duplicate (so the original is a starting point or template for something else), or
* to removable media.
It's not the meta-data handling that concerns me.  I understand the importance of that, and that the meta-data handling does not take up man-noticeable time.  Also, editors (vim is the only one I use), LibreOffice, and other things make working copies of whatever I open the tool on.  So changes are applied to the working copy, not the original, until I commit the changes (":w" and ":wq" in vim, "Save" and "Save as" in most other tools).  These all also keep some list of changes for use by "undo" functionality.  So COW seems redundant with the functionality built into (almost?) everything I use. (Hmmm...  Is "dnf" an exception?)

The real issue is compression, not COW.  I've already disabled COW on /home.  I actually now think I'll reverse it.

I'll make a separate post on that.

Thank-you, everyone.

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to