On Sat, 3 May 2025 at 15:04, Terry Polzin <foxec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And can you state which plugin? Which checksum? Can you see where it's > trying to fetch that from in the logs and verify the upstream artefact > exists? > I fear this may be a maintainer issue, if there is a table of checksums > someplace perhaps it did not get updated correctly in 3.25-2 > Potentially, from a quick skim it seems these plugins are proprietary binaries. I don't know if the checksums are maintained upstream or in the hplip package, but upstream would make more sense. https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/binary_plugin.html Try running `hp-setup` with the `-g` option for additional debug info, or `-lerror`. You haven't stated the actual error, but I've just run hp-plugin myself and see the problem: error: /home/wmcdonald/.hplip/hplip-3.25.2-plugin.run file does not match its checksum. File may have been corrupted or altered https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=6564169#post6564169 indicates a change in the plugin format, obviously the tooling hasn't caught up with that change. The workaround for now is to download the plugin package, unzip and then point hp-setup or hp-plugin at the expanded archive. https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/plugins I'll raise a BZ against this just to the maintainer's aware.
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
