> And can you state which plugin? Which checksum? Can you see where it's trying to fetch that from in the logs and verify the upstream artefact exists? I fear this may be a maintainer issue, if there is a table of checksums someplace perhaps it did not get updated correctly in 3.25-2
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 8:29 AM Will McDonald <wmcdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 3 May 2025 at 02:52, Terry Polzin <foxec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> tpolzin@fedora:~$ rpm -qa hplip >> hplip-3.24.4-4.fc42.x86_64 >> tpolzin@fedora:~$ rpm -qa hp\* >> hplip-common-3.24.4-4.fc42.x86_64 >> hplip-libs-3.24.4-4.fc42.x86_64 >> >> So 3.25.2-2 doesn't work, and 3.24.4-4 works in both 41 and 42 >> > > [wmcdonald:~] $ dnf changelog hplip-0:3.25.2-2.fc42.x86_64 > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > Listing all changelogs > Changelogs for hplip-3.25.2-2.fc42.x86_64 > * Wed Apr 16 12:00:00 2025 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 3.25.2-2 > - remove Recommends on hplip-gui due complaint at (fedora#2360020) > * Fri Apr 11 12:00:00 2025 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 3.25.2-1 > - hplip-3.25.2 is available (fedora#2353147) > * Thu Apr 03 12:00:01 2025 FeRD (Frank Dana) <ferd...@gmail.com> - > 3.24.5-5 > - hp-plugin: Use rpm queryformat to get version (no gawk dependency) > * Thu Apr 03 12:00:00 2025 FeRD (Frank Dana) <ferd...@gmail.com> - > 3.24.4-5 > - Use weak rich dependency for hplip-gui > * Wed Apr 02 12:00:01 2025 FeRD (Frank Dana) <ferd...@gmail.com> - > 3.24.4-5 > - Format QDateTime strings in Status History table, elsewhere > * Wed Apr 02 12:00:00 2025 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 3.24.4-5 > - hp-plugin-download did not follow redirections and was missing '-o' in > grep > * Mon Mar 03 12:00:00 2025 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 3.24.4-4 > - enable following links with curl in all use cases (fedora#2349177) > > You might want to bisect the interim releases to narrow down to a specific > change, then go look at what's in that in detail? > > And can you state which plugin? Which checksum? Can you see where it's > trying to fetch that from in the logs and verify the upstream artefact > exists? > > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
