You can set how this mailing list works, just set it. You don't need complain to Yahoo mail. I believe the moderator of this mailing list can do it, if not then we can help to set it.
I see moderator of Xen, CentOS, and others already follow this, why not Kannel? Regards, Wendy ----- Original Message ---- > From: Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> > To: users@kannel.org > Sent: Mon, August 29, 2011 1:54:43 PM > Subject: Re: Wrong setting on Kannel Mailing List? > > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:30, Wendy William wrote: > > I'am using Yahoo webmail and .... ofcourse not only me use Yahoo webmail :) > > Then you should complain to the Yahoo and not this list. > > If all the people of the world use improper Yahoo mail (or any other) > software for mailing list which cannot handle such simple option, that > will not make it proper. It does not work. Period. > > But, this question is discussed many times in this list and I think we > should terminate this useless thread. :) > > > Regards, Wendy > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> > > > To: users@kannel.org > > > Sent: Sun, August 28, 2011 9:14:21 PM > > > Subject: Re: Wrong setting on Kannel Mailing List? > > > > > > On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:14, Wendy William wrote: > > > > I got this complain :) > > > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > Next time, always copy the users list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > == Rene > > > > -------------------------- > > > > Current Kannel mailing settings caused: > > > > 1. I got 2 emails for SAME EMAIL !!! 1 from Rene and 1 form kannel.org > > > > 2. I must click Replay to All, because klik to Reply only send to Rene > > > > 3. Wasting time, wasting bandwidth > > > > 4. How do I filter mail from Rene to be deleted because I have got > > > > same > > > >email > > > > > > > from kannel behind Rene (also other users) ? > > > > > > > > So, I hope the moderator change the mailing list setting to avoid > > > > this > > >complain, > > > > > > > please ... > > > > > > It would be better to use e-mail client which know how to reply to > > > mailing list. And not only you but most of the people subscribed to > > > this list. > > > > > > > Regards, Wendy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > From: Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> > > > > > To: users@kannel.org > > > > > Sent: Mon, August 22, 2011 3:00:19 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: Wrong setting on Kannel Mailing List? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Juan, > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 20:02, Juan Nin wrote: > > > > > > Milan, I don't take it as an offense at all, not sure what you > > > > > > understood with my reply, but it was not directed to you at > > > > all, >was > > > > > > directed to Wendy the original poster :) > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for my bad English. > > > > > > > > > > I didn't want to say that you offended me. I put <no offense> tag >to > > > > > tell that I don't want to offend you. :) > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/21/11 3:55 PM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > > > > > > >On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 11:08, Juan Nin wrote: > > > > > > >>The "good" or "not good" depends on each person... > > > > > > >Well, yes. There is "proper" also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>There's always debate on this topic on every mailing-list, where > > > > > > >>some people claim one way is the "correct" or "better" one, >and > > > some > > > > > > >>people claim it's the other one, and each of them have their >good > > > > > > >>reasons... Search on google and you'll find tons of topics on >this > > > > > > >>matter, and you will be able to see the different opinions >about > > > it. > > > > > > ><no offense> > > > > > > >I'm subscribed to different mailing lists for more than > > > > fifteen >years > > > > > > >and I don't have to search google about that subject, IMHO. > > > > > > ></no offense> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>At the end of the day, it's the decision of the list owners, >and > > > I'm > > > > > > >>sure that they have already thought about this and that they >won't > > > > > > >>change their mind. :) > > > > > > >Agreed. But, when some random user ask how to reply "canonical >way" I > > > > > > >don't think it is rude to tell about "reply to list" option if >MUA > > > > > > >support that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Regards. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>On 8/21/11 7:54 AM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > > > > > > >>>On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 18:10, Wendy William wrote: > > > > > > >>>>When I do reply any Kannel mail then "To" field filled by >sender, > > > >not > > > > > > > by > > > > > > >>>>users@kannel.org. This is not good since we must use Reply >All that > > > > > > > > >caused > > > > > > >>>>double messages. > > > > > > >>>Check your e-mail client software and see if it have "reply > > > > > > to > > >list" > > > > > > > (or > > > > > > >>>something similar) option. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>Kannel mailing lists works quite well with "normal" e-mail > > clients. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Kind regards, Milan > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > > > > > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Kind regards, Milan > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > > > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > > > > > > > > -- > Kind regards, Milan > -------------------------------------------------- > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > >
