On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:14, Wendy William wrote: > I got this complain :) > > -------------------------- > > Next time, always copy the users list. > > > > > == Rene > -------------------------- > Current Kannel mailing settings caused: > 1. I got 2 emails for SAME EMAIL !!! 1 from Rene and 1 form kannel.org > 2. I must click Replay to All, because klik to Reply only send to Rene > 3. Wasting time, wasting bandwidth > 4. How do I filter mail from Rene to be deleted because I have got same email > from kannel behind Rene (also other users) ? > > So, I hope the moderator change the mailing list setting to avoid this > complain, > please ...
It would be better to use e-mail client which know how to reply to mailing list. And not only you but most of the people subscribed to this list. > Regards, Wendy > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> > > To: users@kannel.org > > Sent: Mon, August 22, 2011 3:00:19 PM > > Subject: Re: Wrong setting on Kannel Mailing List? > > > > Hi Juan, > > > > On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 20:02, Juan Nin wrote: > > > Milan, I don't take it as an offense at all, not sure what you > > > understood with my reply, but it was not directed to you at all, was > > > directed to Wendy the original poster :) > > > > Sorry for my bad English. > > > > I didn't want to say that you offended me. I put <no offense> tag to > > tell that I don't want to offend you. :) > > > > > On 8/21/11 3:55 PM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > > > >On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 11:08, Juan Nin wrote: > > > >>The "good" or "not good" depends on each person... > > > >Well, yes. There is "proper" also. > > > > > > > >>There's always debate on this topic on every mailing-list, where > > > >>some people claim one way is the "correct" or "better" one, and some > > > >>people claim it's the other one, and each of them have their good > > > >>reasons... Search on google and you'll find tons of topics on this > > > >>matter, and you will be able to see the different opinions about it. > > > ><no offense> > > > >I'm subscribed to different mailing lists for more than fifteen years > > > >and I don't have to search google about that subject, IMHO. > > > ></no offense> > > > > > > > >>At the end of the day, it's the decision of the list owners, and I'm > > > >>sure that they have already thought about this and that they won't > > > >>change their mind. :) > > > >Agreed. But, when some random user ask how to reply "canonical way" I > > > >don't think it is rude to tell about "reply to list" option if MUA > > > >support that. > > > > > > > >>Regards. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>On 8/21/11 7:54 AM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > > > >>>On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 18:10, Wendy William wrote: > > > >>>>When I do reply any Kannel mail then "To" field filled by sender, > > > >>>>not > by > > > >>>>users@kannel.org. This is not good since we must use Reply All that > >caused > > > >>>>double messages. > > > >>>Check your e-mail client software and see if it have "reply to list" > (or > > > >>>something similar) option. > > > >>> > > > >>>Kannel mailing lists works quite well with "normal" e-mail clients. > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Kind regards, Milan > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > > > > -- Kind regards, Milan -------------------------------------------------- Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.
