Guys, let me up this one again. Still looking for comments about kafka-consumer-groups.sh tool.
Thank you. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <dvsekhval...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've tried 3 brokers on command line, like that: > > /usr/local/kafka/bin/kafka-consumer-groups.sh --bootstrap-server > broker:9092,broker_2:9092,broker_3:9092 --new-consumer --group > logging-svc --describe > > it doesn't make any difference, still x10 times difference in figures when > running on broker host vs. remote > > Here is snippet from console output (are you looking something specific in > it? it looks normal a far as i can say): > > > TOPIC PARTITION CURRENT-OFFSET LOG-END-OFFSET LAG > CONSUMER-ID > > test.topic 54 4304 4309 35 > consumer-26-21f5050c-a43c-4254-bfcf-42e17dbdb651 > > test.topic 40 4426 4436 10 > consumer-21-24f3ebca-004f-4aac-a348-638c9c6a02f0 > > test.topic 59 4414 4420 63 > consumer-27-ed34f1b3-1be9-422b-bb07-e3c9913195c7 > > test.topic 42 4389 4403 76 > consumer-22-75c2fc0a-5d5c-472d-b27e-e873030f82b6 > > test.topic 27 4416 4422 24 > consumer-18-3be20568-8dd3-4679-a008-0ca64d31083c > > > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> kafka-consumer-groups.sh --bootstrap-server broker:9092 --new-consumer >> --group service-group --describe >> >> how many brokers do you have in the cluster? if you have more than one, >> list them all using a comma csv with --bootstrap-server. >> >> Also, could you paste some results from the console printout? >> >> On 7 July 2017 at 12:47, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <dvsekhval...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > question about lag checking. We've tried to periodically sample consumer >> > lag with: >> > >> > kafka-consumer-groups.sh --bootstrap-server broker:9092 --new-consumer >> > --group service-group --describe >> > >> > it's all fine, but depending on host we run it from it gives different >> > results. >> > >> > E.g: >> > >> > - when running from one of the broker hosts itself we getting close >> to 0 >> > figures. >> > >> > - when running from remote host, we getting 30-60 in average (i >> suspect >> > there are multiple remote calls to broker involved, so difference due to >> > timing). >> > >> > >> > My question is what is correct way to use it? From broker host itself? >> > >> > >
