I've tried 3 brokers on command line, like that:

/usr/local/kafka/bin/kafka-consumer-groups.sh --bootstrap-server
broker:9092,broker_2:9092,broker_3:9092 --new-consumer --group logging-svc
--describe

it doesn't make any difference, still x10 times difference in figures when
running on broker host vs. remote

Here is snippet from console output (are you looking something specific in
it? it looks normal a far as i can say):


TOPIC                    PARTITION  CURRENT-OFFSET  LOG-END-OFFSET    LAG
      CONSUMER-ID

test.topic                  54         4304            4309            35
       consumer-26-21f5050c-a43c-4254-bfcf-42e17dbdb651

test.topic                  40         4426            4436            10
      consumer-21-24f3ebca-004f-4aac-a348-638c9c6a02f0

test.topic                  59         4414            4420            63
       consumer-27-ed34f1b3-1be9-422b-bb07-e3c9913195c7

test.topic                  42         4389            4403            76
      consumer-22-75c2fc0a-5d5c-472d-b27e-e873030f82b6

test.topic                  27         4416            4422            24
       consumer-18-3be20568-8dd3-4679-a008-0ca64d31083c




On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> kafka-consumer-groups.sh --bootstrap-server broker:9092 --new-consumer
> --group service-group --describe
>
> how many brokers do you have in the cluster? if you have more than one,
> list them all using a comma csv with --bootstrap-server.
>
> Also, could you paste some results from the console printout?
>
> On 7 July 2017 at 12:47, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <dvsekhval...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > question about lag checking. We've tried to periodically sample consumer
> > lag with:
> >
> > kafka-consumer-groups.sh --bootstrap-server broker:9092 --new-consumer
> > --group service-group --describe
> >
> > it's all fine, but depending on host  we run it from it gives different
> > results.
> >
> > E.g:
> >
> >   - when running from one of the broker hosts itself we getting close to
> 0
> > figures.
> >
> >   - when running from remote host, we getting 30-60 in average (i suspect
> > there are multiple remote calls to broker involved, so difference due to
> > timing).
> >
> >
> > My question is what is correct way to use it? From broker host itself?
> >
>

Reply via email to