From reading the bylaws it's not entirely clear who closes the vote or how they decide when to do so.
Given a week has passed and assuming Jay's and Matthias's votes are binding, we have a result of +4 votes with no other votes cast. I'll update the KIP with the result shortly :) > On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Zakee <kzak...@netzero.net> wrote: > > +1 > > -Zakee >> On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> Nice improvement. >> >> -Jay >> >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Steven Schlansker < >> sschlans...@opentable.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, it looks like I have 2 of the 3 minimum votes, can a third voter >>> please consider this KIP? >>> Thanks. >>> >>> (PS - new revision on GitHub PR with hopefully the last round of >>> improvements) >>> >>>> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On 2/8/17 4:51 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Steven Schlansker >>>>> <sschlans...@opentable.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for constructive feedback on KIP-121, >>> KStream.peek(ForeachAction<K, V>) ; >>>>>> it seems like it is time to call a vote which I hope will pass easily >>> :) >>>>>> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >>> 121%3A+Add+KStream+peek+method >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe the PR attached is already in good shape to consider merging: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2493 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> Steven >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > ____________________________________________________________ > Police Urge Your City Residents to Carry This at All Times > Smart Trends > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3231/58a39467a3d7f146654a1st03duc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
