From reading the bylaws it's not entirely clear who closes the vote or how they
decide when to do so.

Given a week has passed and assuming Jay's and Matthias's votes are binding,
we have a result of +4 votes with no other votes cast.

I'll update the KIP with the result shortly :)

> On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Zakee <kzak...@netzero.net> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> -Zakee
>> On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Nice improvement.
>> 
>> -Jay
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Steven Schlansker <
>> sschlans...@opentable.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi, it looks like I have 2 of the 3 minimum votes, can a third voter
>>> please consider this KIP?
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> (PS - new revision on GitHub PR with hopefully the last round of
>>> improvements)
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> On 2/8/17 4:51 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Steven Schlansker
>>>>> <sschlans...@opentable.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you for constructive feedback on KIP-121,
>>> KStream.peek(ForeachAction<K, V>) ;
>>>>>> it seems like it is time to call a vote which I hope will pass easily
>>> :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>> 121%3A+Add+KStream+peek+method
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I believe the PR attached is already in good shape to consider merging:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2493
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Steven
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Police Urge Your City Residents to Carry This at All Times
> Smart Trends
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3231/58a39467a3d7f146654a1st03duc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to