+1 -Zakee > On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > +1 > > Nice improvement. > > -Jay > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Steven Schlansker < > sschlans...@opentable.com> wrote: > >> Hi, it looks like I have 2 of the 3 minimum votes, can a third voter >> please consider this KIP? >> Thanks. >> >> (PS - new revision on GitHub PR with hopefully the last round of >> improvements) >> >>> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On 2/8/17 4:51 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Steven Schlansker >>>> <sschlans...@opentable.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for constructive feedback on KIP-121, >> KStream.peek(ForeachAction<K, V>) ; >>>>> it seems like it is time to call a vote which I hope will pass easily >> :) >>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >> 121%3A+Add+KStream+peek+method >>>>> >>>>> I believe the PR attached is already in good shape to consider merging: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2493 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Steven >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>
____________________________________________________________ Police Urge Your City Residents to Carry This at All Times Smart Trends http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3231/58a39467a3d7f146654a1st03duc
