filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-978
I can try to take a look, can you point me to where/how you generate the pom file? On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jason, there are two different answers in regards to Scala version in my > opinion as there are clear distinctions between broker and > producers/consumers. > > I don't know what the mix is but experience with brokers is only building > and running in production 2.8.0 and I suspect this is the same for others > out there. > > It would be awesome to get more information on stats from the community and > I will have a lot more cycles starting in 2 weeks towards these type of > activities. > > As far as producer/consumers go I have run 2.8.0, 2.9.0-1, 2.9.1 and 2.9.2 > in production as well as python and ruby (all 0.7.X). > > As I said in two weeks I have some changes occurring that will start to not > only give me more time to the community but more specific focuses. > > I apologize for the delayed response. > > And yeah, JIRA for the duplicate ZK it does seem odd to me too not sure off > hand why that is > > Patches are always welcome from anyone :) > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> wrote: > > > Any thoughts on my question, wrt scala version to prefer? Also, what of > > the double dependency on zookeeper? Should I file a jira for that? > > > > Jason > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for doing this! > > > > > > I'm wondering whether there is a reason to prefer one version of scala > > > over another, if we don't have any other particular scala dependency in > > our > > > code. Are the newer versions better/more efficient, some how? We've > > > essentially been using 2.8.0 so far, which seems to be fine (so I'm not > > > particularly inclined to change, but I'm just curious). > > > > > > One thing I notice, in the pom file, there are 2 dependencies listed > for > > > zookeeper, one of which has an exclusion clause, the other does not. > I > > > assume this is not intended: > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId> > > > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId> > > > <version>3.3.4</version> > > > <exclusions> > > > <exclusion> > > > <groupId>log4j</groupId> > > > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> > > > </exclusion> > > > <exclusion> > > > <groupId>jline</groupId> > > > <artifactId>jline</artifactId> > > > </exclusion> > > > </exclusions> > > > </dependency> > > > > > > and then > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId> > > > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId> > > > <version>3.3.4</version> > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> SBT uses Maven Central as a default repository (local ivy too). > > >> > > >> The artifacts are published to Maven Central so nothing you should > have > > >> to-do except to specify the libraryDependencies > > >> > > >> In regards to 2.10.X support I took a really quick look at > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-717 (lots to go through > in > > >> that > > >> ticket it seems) will try some of the patch applys tomorrow and see > how > > >> they go. I would be in favor of it being part of the 0.8.0 final if > it > > >> all > > >> gets through and looks good and committing it to the 0.8 branch and > not > > >> only trunk but lets see first what is involved building 2.10.0, 2.10.1 > > and > > >> 2.10.2 and what is going to take to get it working with the patches > > >> submitted. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:44 PM, chetan conikee <coni...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Excellent > > >> > > > >> > What about the resolver ? sonatype, typeafe. maven artifactory ? > > >> > Any plans for a 2.10+ compile as well > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dima Gutzeit <gutz...@maaii.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > What about the "newer" (not so new anymore) scala version 2.10.0 > and > > >> up ? > > >> > > When will it be supported officially ? > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Regards, > > >> > > Dima Gutzeit. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On 15/7/13 9:32 AM, "Joe Stein" <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > >With SBT you can use 0.8.1-beta built with any of these four > Scala > > >> > > >versions > > >> > > >in libraryDependencies now > > >> > > > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > >> > > > > > >> > > >or > > >> > > > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.1" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > >> > > > > > >> > > >or > > >> > > > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.8.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > >> > > > > > >> > > >or > > >> > > > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.8.0" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >/* > > >> > > >Joe Stein > > >> > > >http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > > >> > > >Twitter: @allthingshadoop < > http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > > >> > > >*/ > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> /* > > >> Joe Stein > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > > >> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > > >> */ > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > /* > Joe Stein > http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > */ >
