Any thoughts on my question, wrt scala version to prefer? Also, what of the double dependency on zookeeper? Should I file a jira for that?
Jason On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> wrote: > Thanks for doing this! > > I'm wondering whether there is a reason to prefer one version of scala > over another, if we don't have any other particular scala dependency in our > code. Are the newer versions better/more efficient, some how? We've > essentially been using 2.8.0 so far, which seems to be fine (so I'm not > particularly inclined to change, but I'm just curious). > > One thing I notice, in the pom file, there are 2 dependencies listed for > zookeeper, one of which has an exclusion clause, the other does not. I > assume this is not intended: > > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId> > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId> > <version>3.3.4</version> > <exclusions> > <exclusion> > <groupId>log4j</groupId> > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> > </exclusion> > <exclusion> > <groupId>jline</groupId> > <artifactId>jline</artifactId> > </exclusion> > </exclusions> > </dependency> > > and then > > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId> > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId> > <version>3.3.4</version> > </dependency> > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> SBT uses Maven Central as a default repository (local ivy too). >> >> The artifacts are published to Maven Central so nothing you should have >> to-do except to specify the libraryDependencies >> >> In regards to 2.10.X support I took a really quick look at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-717 (lots to go through in >> that >> ticket it seems) will try some of the patch applys tomorrow and see how >> they go. I would be in favor of it being part of the 0.8.0 final if it >> all >> gets through and looks good and committing it to the 0.8 branch and not >> only trunk but lets see first what is involved building 2.10.0, 2.10.1 and >> 2.10.2 and what is going to take to get it working with the patches >> submitted. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:44 PM, chetan conikee <coni...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Excellent >> > >> > What about the resolver ? sonatype, typeafe. maven artifactory ? >> > Any plans for a 2.10+ compile as well >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dima Gutzeit <gutz...@maaii.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > What about the "newer" (not so new anymore) scala version 2.10.0 and >> up ? >> > > When will it be supported officially ? >> > > >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Dima Gutzeit. >> > > >> > > >> > > On 15/7/13 9:32 AM, "Joe Stein" <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > >With SBT you can use 0.8.1-beta built with any of these four Scala >> > > >versions >> > > >in libraryDependencies now >> > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() >> > > > >> > > >or >> > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.1" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() >> > > > >> > > >or >> > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.8.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() >> > > > >> > > >or >> > > > >> > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.8.0" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >/* >> > > >Joe Stein >> > > >http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc >> > > >Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> >> > > >*/ >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> /* >> Joe Stein >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc >> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> >> */ >> > >
