I've tested my examples with the new (4/30) release and they work, so I've updated the documentation.
Thanks, Chris On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. I also updated your producer example to reflect a recent config > change (broker.list => metadata.broker.list). > > Jun > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Chris Curtin <curtin.ch...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Thanks, I missed that the addition of consumers can cause a re-balance. > > Thought it was only on Leader changes. > > > > I've updated the wording in the example. > > > > I'll pull down the beta and test my application then change the names on > > the properties. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chris > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Basically, every time a consumer joins a group, every consumer in the > > > groups gets a ZK notification and each of them tries to own a subset of > > the > > > total number of partitions. A given partition is only assigned to one > of > > > the consumers in the same group. Once the ownership is determined, each > > > consumer consumes messages coming from its partitions and manages the > > > offset of those partitions. Since at any given point of time, a > partition > > > is only owned by one consumer, there won't be conflicts on updating the > > > offsets. More details are described in the "consumer rebalancing > > algorithm" > > > section of http://kafka.apache.org/07/design.html > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Chris Curtin <curtin.ch...@gmail.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Jun, can you explain this a little better? I thought when using > > Consumer > > > > Groups that on startup Kafka connects to ZooKeeper and finds the last > > > read > > > > offset for every partition in the topic being requested for the > group. > > > That > > > > is then the starting point for the consumer threads. > > > > > > > > If a second process starts while the first one is running with the > same > > > > Consumer Group, won't the second one read the last offsets consumed > by > > > the > > > > already running process and start processing from there? Then as the > > > first > > > > process syncs consumed offsets, won't the 2nd process's next update > > > > overwrite them? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Chris, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the writeup. Looks great overall. A couple of comments. > > > > > > > > > > 1. At the beginning, it sounds like that one can't run multiple > > > processes > > > > > of consumers in the same group. This is actually not true. We can > > > create > > > > > multiple instances of consumers for the same group in the same JVM > or > > > > > different JVMs. The consumers will auto-balance among themselves. > > > > > > > > > > 2. We have changed the name of some config properties. > > > > > auto.commit.interval.ms is correct. However, zk.connect, > > > > > zk.session.timeout.ms and zk.sync.time.ms are changed to > > > > > zookeeper.connect, > > > > > zookeeper.session.timeout.ms, and zookeeper.sync.time.ms, > > > respectively. > > > > > > > > > > I will add a link to your wiki in our website. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again. > > > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Chris Curtin < > > curtin.ch...@gmail.com > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jun, > > > > > > > > > > > > I finished and published it this morning: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Consumer+Group+Example > > > > > > > > > > > > One question: when documenting the ConsumerConfig parameters I > > > couldn't > > > > > > find a description for the 'auto.commit.interval.ms' setting. I > > > found > > > > > one > > > > > > for 'autocommit.interval.ms' (no '.' between auto and commit) in > > the > > > > > > Google > > > > > > Cache only. Which spelling is it? Also is my description of it > > > correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll take a look at custom encoders later this week. Today and > > > Tuesday > > > > > are > > > > > > going to be pretty busy. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if there are changes needed to the High Level > > > > Consumer > > > > > > page. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update of the high level consumer example? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, in the Producer example, it would be useful to describe > how > > > to > > > > > > write > > > > > > > a customized encoder. One subtle thing is that the encoder > needs > > a > > > > > > > constructor that takes a a single VerifiableProperties > argument ( > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-869). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
