I just recently attempted upgrading an old cluster to 2.4 however due to massive use of old .htaccess rules with allow/denies it simply wasn't worth the effort to migrate everything to the new configurations.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, David Benfell <benf...@parts-unknown.org>wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:43:17PM -0500, Joey J wrote: > > Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only > > used by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? > > The Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for > > some time and looking at the improvements I see significant value in > > several. I don't see any reason why anybody wouldn't want to use it > > but the community seems to think it's bad. > > > I'm actually fighting my way through this upgrade now. It's not that I > think 2.4 is bad. Not at all. It's just that the upgrade is difficult > and I have other things I need to be working on. > > -- > David Benfell <benf...@parts-unknown.org> > See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the > attachment. >
