Well, most of the mods were just easily hackable, the major pain is to tell the users to update .htaccess and more stuff, my new servers push users to 2.4.x, but old users have priority to "keep using as it always was".
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Nick Tkach <ntk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Among other things I'm sure many are using modules that just plain > won't build/run for 2.4.x. For example, I know at a place I worked a > few years ago they were using a module that an app server depended on > which would not build for anything beyond Apache 2.2 (we tried, > believe me). > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Filipe Cifali <cifali.fil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think it's good, but most of my clients already had their share of pain > > from Apache 2.0.x to 2.2.x. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Joey J <j...@buymro.net> wrote: > >> > >> Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only > used > >> by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The > Apache > >> foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time and > looking > >> at the improvements I see significant value in several. I don't see any > >> reason why anybody wouldn't want to use it but the community seems to > think > >> it's bad. > >> > >> What am I missing?? > >> > >> Current market share: > >> http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ws-apache/2.4/all > >> > >> -Joey J > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > [ ]'s > > > > Filipe Cifali Stangler > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > -- [ ]'s Filipe Cifali Stangler
