On 15/08/2013 at 16:14, Holger Schmithüsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, this removal of unnecessary direct formatting is not very > appropriate, as I sometimes do have direct formatting (a subscript for > instance). You can create subscript by applying character style to specific set of characters. Removing direct formatting will not remove character style. But then, using styles for each and every change of formatting is sometimes tiresome (especially when style is applied to only one paragraph/character). > Is it possible to suppress Writer's behaviour of defining those > meaningless automatic styles? And if not, is it possible to get rid of > only the meaningless direct formatting, i.e. those <style:style> > elements, that do not contain any formatting attributes? Not that I am aware of. As for "why" (in topic title): this is rather advanced question and requires more knowledge about LO internals than most users here have. Perhaps you would have better luck asking this question on developers mailing list - they have better insight than us and might provide some useful information. But I *suppose* that this is one of many artifacts back from OOo 1.0 or even StarOffice times. And since it is critical for entire software, no one has dared to touch it yet. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
