Yup.. Thanks Rob. I’ll do this today. Kevin
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good point - I think it's a bug - you can always turn advisories off if > you don't want a flood of them. Can you raise an issue so it doesn't get > forgotten? > > > > On 2 Feb 2015, at 17:53, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > > >> This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that > >> can send to any destination that it has permission to write to. Sending > >> that advisory every time an anonymous producer sent a message to a given > >> destination would create a flood of advisories which would not really > be of > >> help. > > > > > > Why is that? > > > > I mean I can create the flood of advisories now anyway. I just have to > > manually create a non-anonymous producer and it would then send the same > > number of advisories. > > > > Now it’s just slower and you’ve put a burden on me to maintain an LRU > cache > > and expiry so that I can have reasonable performance :-( > > > > -- > > > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > > … or check out my Google+ profile > > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > > <http://spinn3r.com> > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
