Good point - I think it's a bug - you can always turn advisories off if you don't want a flood of them. Can you raise an issue so it doesn't get forgotten?
On 2 Feb 2015, at 17:53, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: >> This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that >> can send to any destination that it has permission to write to. Sending >> that advisory every time an anonymous producer sent a message to a given >> destination would create a flood of advisories which would not really be of >> help. > > > Why is that? > > I mean I can create the flood of advisories now anyway. I just have to > manually create a non-anonymous producer and it would then send the same > number of advisories. > > Now it’s just slower and you’ve put a burden on me to maintain an LRU cache > and expiry so that I can have reasonable performance :-( > > -- > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > … or check out my Google+ profile > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > <http://spinn3r.com>
