> This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that > can send to any destination that it has permission to write to. Sending > that advisory every time an anonymous producer sent a message to a given > destination would create a flood of advisories which would not really be of > help.
Why is that? I mean I can create the flood of advisories now anyway. I just have to manually create a non-anonymous producer and it would then send the same number of advisories. Now it’s just slower and you’ve put a burden on me to maintain an LRU cache and expiry so that I can have reasonable performance :-( -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
