Activemq doesn't do "shared store" The first machine to attach will lock the db and the second will wait in failover mode.
On Jun 20, 2013, at 12:50, deepak_a <angesh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks! > I can confirm that my brokers are able to Discover each other. > > > But from your earlier statements > 'you'll won't be able to share databases' > 'they would all have their own persistence stores' > > I see no reason why this won't work - so is this something not-recommended > by activeMQ? becuase of locking/performance issues? > > As I mentioned earlier my intention is to let both the brokers running > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Clustered-JBoss-and-JDBC-Master-Slave-td2348023.html#a2348028 > My design is similar to the diagram in the above link. > > Only difference in instead of finding a master, (load balance r will ensure > that) messages are sent to both the brokers when they are healthy. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-clustering-integrated-with-JBoss-tp4668358p4668426.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
