As per this link http://activemq.apache.org/can-two-brokers-share-the-same-database.html
It appears the recommendation is not to share database. This link recommends another strategy http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-master-slave.html But this will work if I were to follow "Clustered Singleton Services" i.e. a Master node in my cluster runs and if it goes down, one of the other nodes resumes. But my strategy is to use "Farming Deployment" where all nodes will be up and running and processing messages and each node will have an activeMQ broker (but the database being shared) Would appreciate if some one can suggest some ideas. regards D -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-clustering-integrated-with-JBoss-tp4668358p4668408.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
